In the typical enterprise environment, there are some project managers whose job is to liaise between different groups, to moderate a seamless flow of communications, and to preside over the necessary meetings that keep complicated projects moving on pace toward their goals. But for many whose jobs involve actual production — either in the form of deliverables or closing new sales deals—the prospect of burning daylight hours in a conference room while a representative of management slings cliché business buzzwords like ‘low-hanging fruit,’ and/or ‘moving forward,’ rates somewhere between listening to nails on a chalkboard and visiting the dentist.
And this isn’t hyperbole; the truth is that 46% of employed Americans would rather do an assortment of unpleasant tasks (such as wait in line at the DMV, commute for several hours, or even watch paint dry) than spend time in status meetings. In fact, in a survey where 1000 business employees were asked to rank the biggest workplace distractions, ‘too many meetings’ was the number-one answer, beating out ‘inefficient team members,’ ‘office politics,’ ‘busy work,’ and even ‘bad bosses.’
Business professionals don’t want to sit through hours of pointless jargon when they could be making actual progress on their workload. After all, it is their own performances, rather than their abilities to remain attentive during meetings, on which their careers depend. Despite this, as much as 37% of employee time is spent in meetings (according to the National Statistics Council).
That is not to suggest that meetings are bad in and of themselves. Project updates, sales, brainstorming, information sharing, and strategy are all critical elements of most projects, and all those initiatives are advanced through meetings. In fact, the complex digital workplace of today is far more robustly team-oriented than ever before. That makes frequent meetings all the more necessary.
On the other hand, if you put that into context by factoring in all the salaries and overhead for meeting space and related utilities, it becomes obvious that heavy amounts of cash are spent on meetings every month. Some studies estimate that, nationwide, $37 billion in employee salaries is spent annually in time and preparations related to meetings. So, if those meetings are either unnecessary or ineffective, which according to Psychology Today around half of them are, a lot of money is flowing down the drain on a near-constant basis.
For certain types of meetings, telecommunications technology has helped reduce costs, mainly by cutting travel expenses and travel time. Still, there is a certain type of meeting, a sales meeting, that is still most effective when held in person. In-person meetings are rated the most productive, and 87% of professionals polled say, given the choice, the prefer to meet in person. But, the fact that in-person meetings are by far the most cost intensive presents a dilemma. Obviously, landing new clients is the lifeblood of any business enterprise. So if it remains necessary to conduct the majority of sales meetings in person, then understanding what makes a good sales meeting—as well as how to run a sales meeting without hemorrhaging company cash—should be considered one of the most-vital business skills.
So far, we have established that meetings are here to stay. But too many meetings, or poorly planned ones, lead to wasted time, exhausted resources, and employee disillusionment. According to a poll taken by atlassian.com, 91% of respondents admit to daydreaming during meetings, 39% admit to having dozed off during a meeting, 45% feel overwhelmed by the number of meetings they are required to attend, 73% tend to work on other things during meetings, and 47% complain that meetings are the top time waster in their workday. There’s no way that’s what a business entity thinks it’s paying for when it schedules meetings.
This, of course, leaves business leaders with a dilemma: how can an organization balance the need for team coordination and communication, without having a negative impact on productivity or employee satisfaction? To answer this difficult question, we’ve compiled a few useful tips.
It certainly is odd that most people say they still prefer to hold sales meetings in person, but then complain about the ineffectiveness and inefficiencies common to meetings. There’s an obvious systemic disconnect inherent in business culture, but it doesn’t have to be that way. By taking an honest look at the meetings being held, as well as the purposes and reasoning behind those meetings, organizations will be able to refine their meeting processes to produce a more efficient and effective company culture.
The best way to get to know Sales Cloud is to get your hands on the actual product. The free trial also comes with unlimited access to our Sales Community, a group of sales thought leaders sharing ideas about sales for salespeople.
Questions? Our reps have answers. 1-800-667-6389